List of proposals for EuroDIG 2023

Amali De Silva-Mitchell | 13-09-22 | 06:07
Access & literacy | Innovation & economic issues | Technical & operational issues
What is the optimal ecosystem to accelerate the space of data driven health technologies ? Are there better ways to build back stronger and faster ? What should we pursue and what should we shed from the experience of using telemedicine during covid ?
Submitted by
Amali De Silva-Mitchell
Affiliation
UN IGF Dynamic Coalition on Data Driven Health Technologies
Stakeholder
Other

Amali De Silva-Mitchell | 13-09-22 | 06:19
Development of IG ecosystem | Human rights & privacy | Innovation & economic issues
Doctor, medical staff, medical equipment and service access is in shortage and will reach a crisis soon. How can the internet and emerging technologies be used to assist healthcare, research, collaboration for service delivery and development, Including education?
Submitted by
Amali De Silva-Mitchell
Affiliation
UN IGF Dynamic Coalition on Data Driven Health Technologies
Stakeholder
Other

Stephanie Teeuwen | 14-09-22 | 16:58
Innovation & economic issues | Technical & operational issues
Internet fragmentation and the three categories of causes (technical, political, economic) and the two areas that are affected by internet fragmentation (economic, human rights).
Submitted by
Stephanie Teeuwen
Affiliation
Netherlands IGF (NL IGF)
Stakeholder
Civil society

Dennis Redeker | 22-09-22 | 12:49
Human rights & privacy | Security & crime | Technical & operational issues
Quantum technology, including quantum cryptography, might upend the current system of (asymmetric) encryption including on the protocol level (if it ever comes to full implementation). Europe and European stakeholders should be prepared to co-design new post-quantum encryption, protocols and legal and ethical guidelines. This issue relates to privacy and human rights as well as demanding (potentially) new international agreements and institutions to govern a potential quantum future.
Submitted by
Dennis Redeker
Affiliation
Universität Bremen
Stakeholder
Academia

Amali De Silva - Mitchell | 26-09-22 | 04:09
Human rights & privacy | Security & crime | Technical & operational issues
In the media we are increasingly hearing about the lack of awareness and sensitivity to secure the medical internet of things, associated devices and services, access, privacy of data and all matters of risk for the internet. It can be a matter of life or death if a device or service is compromised, or data corrupted. The need to ensure the UN Sendai principles is also key. As customized patient care from home, which is remote, becomes more internet dependent in real time, should an enhanced set of ethical, protection and technical internet standards, for devices and services, for the medical internet of things be developed and adopted ? The patient is a vulnerable individual in the community increasingly dependent on the internet.
Submitted by
Amali De Silva - Mitchell
Affiliation
UN IGF DC DDHT
Stakeholder
Other

Mathieu Paapst | 30-09-22 | 22:51
Development of IG ecosystem | Human rights & privacy
In Europe, we not only have the GDPR, but we also have the ePrivacy Directive. This contains rules concerning the use of cookies, local storage, pixels, API calls, and other resources that can store or read data from the device of an end user. According to these rules, the end users should be informed about the function and purposes of these resources. In general, we can distinguish five purposes: Statistics, Statistics-anonymous, marketing/tracking, Functional and Preferences. The larger problem is that there is no consensus about those purposes. For example, one website may speak about the "functional purpose" for a particular cookie, whereas other websites call the purpose for that same cookie "Technical pur", " Essential", or " strictly necessary". "Statistics" or " analytics" are sometimes also called "Performance", and marketing/tracking is sometimes known as "ad-storage". Preferences Cookies are in some jurisdictions known as functionality. This is of course not transparent to the end-users. We should therefore find consensus in order to standardize the names of these purposes.
Submitted by
Mathieu Paapst
Affiliation
University of Groningen
Stakeholder
Other


Planning process: Call for issues